ArticleJournal of pesticide science2026
Indoor behavior prediction and risk assessment of an active substance in an aerosol for controlling flies and mosquitoes under various conditions.
Article in Journal of pesticide science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using the fugacity model InPestCFD, we predicted the indoor behavior of an active substance in an aerosol intended for controlling flies and mosquitoes under various conditions and conducted a comprehensive risk assessment. In predicting behavior, we examined the impact of spraying methods, room air exchange rates, position of an air inlet, and location of a bed, revealing spatiotemporal behaviors not observed previously. For the risk assessment, we predicted the exposure levels for adults and children based on different scenarios from the predicted concentrations and compared them with the acceptable levels of the active substance. Comparison of the obtained results with the results of risk assessment currently conducted in Japan and the United States revealed that current guidelines are considerably conservative in the United States and sufficiently conservative in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.