Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41908014›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Mechanical performance of narrow dental implants with varying lengths and angled abutments.

Darshana Raut, Gaurav Beohar, Prince Kumar, Mayur Khairnar, Babita Pawar, Nilesh Fatale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Darshana RautDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Bhabha College of Dental Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Gaurav BeoharDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Bhabha College of Dental Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Prince KumarDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Bhabha College of Dental Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Mayur KhairnarPrivate Practitioner, Precigem Dental World, Mumbai.
Babita PawarDepartment of Peridontics, Yogita Dental College & Hospital, Khed, Maharashtra, India.
Nilesh FataleDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Bhabha College of Dental Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical performance of narrow-diameter dental implants with varying lengths and abutment angulations remains a critical factor in long-term clinical success. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate Quickdent implant systems under static and fatigue loading according to ISO 14801:2016E. Group 1 (3.5 mm x 10 mm, 25° abutment) and Group 2 (3.5 mm x 25 mm, 45° abutment) were tested using fifteen assemblies per group. Group 1 showed 418 N static and 182 N fatigue resistance, while Group 2 showed 454 N static and 160 N fatigue resistance with distinct failure modes. Thus, we show that longer implants offer higher static strength, whereas shorter ones perform better under fatigue conditions.

Indexed as

angled abutmentDental implantsfatigue testingmechanical propertiesnarrow diameter

Identifiers

PMID41908014
PMCPMC13018333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.