Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907990›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Vishwannath Hiremath, Darshan Modi, Kuldip R Panchal, Snigdha Somi, Syed Sajid Basha, Esther Lhingneihoi Mate

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vishwannath HiremathDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, A Unit of Hiremath Hospitals Pvt Ltd) Vijayanagar Bangalore 560040, India.
Darshan ModiDepartment of Periodontics, Karnavati school of dentistry, Uvarsad, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, 382422, India.
Kuldip R PanchalDepartment of Oral and maxillofacial surgery, Darshan Dental College and Hospital, Loyara, Rajasthan, India.
Snigdha SomiDepartment of Prosthodontics, Dental Surgery VMMC & Safdurjung New Delhi, India.
Syed Sajid BashaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Maharana pratap college of dentistry and research centre, Gwalior, India.
Esther Lhingneihoi MateKalinga Institute Of Dental Science, KIIT Deemed To Be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe maxillary atrophy restricts the conventional position of the implants because of insufficient bone height; the alternative anchorage systems like the zygomatic implants should be used. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the distribution of stress under zygomatic and conventional implant designs during simulated occlusive loading. Six maxillary models were tested in the von Mises stress, principal stress and microstrain when the forces are vertical and oblique. Quad-zygomatic arrangements were the least stressed and the most evenly distributed, being far within the range of physiological values. Zygomatic implants, particularly the quad-zygomatic configurations, have better biomechanics in atrophic maxillae than standard methods of implants.

Indexed as

atrophic maxillabiomechanicsbone-implant interfacedental implantsfinite element analysisstress distributionZygomatic implants

Identifiers

PMID41907990
PMCPMC13018465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.