ArticleBioinformation2025
A comparative study of endodontic treatment versus surgical procedures in managing dental trauma and tooth avulsion.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental trauma, particularly tooth avulsion, poses a significant challenge in both pediatric and adult dentistry. Effective management of avulsed teeth is crucial for long-term dental health, as it impacts survival rates, pulp vitality, clinical healing, pain levels, and aesthetic outcomes. Ninety patients were randomly assigned to receive either endodontic treatment or surgical replantation and their outcomes were assessed over 12 months. Data showed that surgical replantation had higher survival rates, better clinical healing and improved aesthetic satisfaction compared to endodontic treatment. Pulp vitality declined more in the endodontic group and pain levels were significantly lower in the surgical group. Thus, we show that surgical replantation is generally more effective for managing avulsed teeth, particularly when performed promptly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.