ArticleBioinformation2025
Assessment of flexural strength, diametral tensile strength and microhardness among Cention-N, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and resin composite: An
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of mechanically strong restorative materials in posterior teeth is still a clinical issue in modern dentistry. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the flexural strength, diametral tensile strength and surface microhardness of three tooth-colored restorative materials, which are Cention-N (alkasite-based material), Beautifil II LC (giomer) and Ionolux (resin-modified glass ionomer cement). A total of 90 shaped cylindrical samples were produced and put under mechanical testing procedures. Statistically, Cition N has been found to have a much better flexural strength (58.33-1.74 Mpa), microhardness (55.61-8.25 Hv) and still had similar diametral tensile strength as the giomer formulation. Thus, we show that restorative materials composed of alkasite have desirable mechanical characteristics that can be used in loading of the posterior part of the tooth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.