Comparison CT radiation dose parameters, DLP and CTDI between two prominent tertiary care hospitals in Delhi NCR.

Lalit Gupta, Ashok Sharma, Ashish Kumar Shukla, Sumit Tyagi

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Comparison of DLP and CTDI in somatom Definition Flash and GE revolution computed tomography scanners at AIIMS, India.Bioinformation · 2026
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lalit GuptaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging Technology, Santosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Ashok SharmaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging Technology, Santosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Ashish Kumar ShuklaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging Technology, Santosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Sumit TyagiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging Technology, Santosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The variations in radiation exposure levels and dose management protocols across hospitals pose challenges in optimizing CT radiation doses. Therefore, is it of interest to compares the CT radiation dose parameters, including Dose Length Product (DLP) and Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI), across two prominent tertiary care hospitals in the Delhi NCR region. The research aims to evaluate differences in radiation exposure levels, highlighting the variations in dose management protocols. Data was collected from routine CT scans to determine the dose levels at each hospital. This study contributes to the understanding of radiation exposure management by comparing CT radiation dose parameters across two major hospitals in Delhi NCR, offering insights into dose optimization practices.

Indexed as

CTDICT radiation doseDLPradiation safetytertiary care hospitals

Identifiers

PMID41907964

DOI10.6026/973206300214991

PMCPMC13018423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.