Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907961›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-based techniques for peripheral nerve blocks in upper limb surgeries.

Vivek Ranjan, Sumit Kumar Raman, Mithilesh Kumar, Pawan Kumar, Chhabindra Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vivek RanjanDepartment of Trauma and Emergency, IGIMS, Patna, Bihar, India.
Sumit Kumar RamanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College and Hospital (GMCH), Bettiah, Bihar, India.
Mithilesh KumarDepartment of Anesthesiology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Purnea, Bihar, India.
Pawan KumarDepartment of Orthopedics, AIIMS, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Chhabindra KumarDepartment of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College and Hospital (GMCH), Bettiah, Bihar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal technique for performing peripheral nerve blocks in upper-limb surgeries remains debated, particularly between ultrasound- guided and landmark-based approaches. Therefore, it is of interest to compare nerve blocks guided by ultrasound or landmarks in surgeries of the upper limb. Hence, 72 patients were randomly allocated into the US-guided group and landmark-based group. The ultrasound guided group had better success rate, a more rapid onset of block and fewer number of needle redirections as compared to the landmark based group. Both methods demonstrated comparable rates of complications and amount of operation time. The use of ultrasound guidance in the performance of peripheral nerve blocks in upper limb surgeries was found to be faster and more effective. This study advances knowledge by demonstrating that ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks are more effective and efficient than landmark-based techniques in upper-limb surgeries, offering faster, more precise and safer outcomes.

Indexed as

Complicationsefficiencynerve blockpatient satisfactionultrasound guidance

Identifiers

PMID41907961
PMCPMC13018361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.