Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907958›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Comparison of Yen, Beta, Wits, K angles with ANB in assessing sagittal dysplasia: A cephalometric study.

Rameshwar Arun Munde, Amit Handa, Dipali Raghunath Mane, Akansha Katkar, Nikita Bhagwan, Himanshu Shrivastava, Aditi Sarda

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rameshwar Arun MundeDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Aditya Dental College, Beed, Maharashtra, India.
Amit HandaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Aditya Dental College, Beed, Maharashtra, India.
Dipali Raghunath ManeDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Aditya Dental College, Beed, Maharashtra, India.
Akansha KatkarDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Aditya Dental College, Beed, Maharashtra, India.
Nikita BhagwanDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Aditya Dental College, Beed, Maharashtra, India.
Himanshu ShrivastavaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Aditya Dental College, Beed, Maharashtra, India.
Aditi SardaDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Aditya Dental College, Beed, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancies is crucial in orthodontic diagnosis. The commonly used ANB angle has limitations influenced by craniofacial growth and landmark variability. This study compared Yen angle, Beta angle, Wits appraisal and K angle with ANB angle in 120 cephalograms of adults aged 18-30 years. Statistical analysis showed Yen and Beta angles had the strongest correlation and predictive value, followed by K angle, while Wits appraisal was less reliable. Hence, Yen and Beta angles serve as more dependable alternatives to ANB angle in diagnosing sagittal dysplasia.

Indexed as

ANB angleBeta angleK anglesagittal skeletal dysplasiaWits appraisalYen angle

Identifiers

PMID41907958
PMCPMC13018348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.