ArticleBioinformation2025
Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes for platform-switched bone-level and platform-matched tissue-level implants.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crestal bone preservation is essential for dental implant longevity, yet evidence comparing tissue-level (TL) and bone-level (BL) designs remains inconsistent. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate 30 implant sites assigned to TL (n=15) or platform-switched BL (n=15) implants to compare clinical outcomes, crestal bone levels, and implant stability. Clinical parameters including bleeding on probing, plaque index, probing depth, gingival margin position, and clinical attachment level were recorded at 2 and 8 months, while CBCT assessed crestal bone changes and resonance frequency analysis measured implant stability. Both groups showed comparable peri-implant soft-tissue parameters and similar crestal bone loss at 8 months, with no significant differences in implant stability. Both TL and BL implant designs demonstrated equivalent clinical and radiographic performance, confirming their suitability for implant-supported restorations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.