ArticleBioinformation2025
Microscopic evaluation of microleakage in retrograde filling materials using conventional and ultrasonic techniques.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retrograde filling success largely depends on the sealing ability of the material and the quality of the cavity preparation technique. Therefore, it is of interest to compare apical microleakage among MTA, Biodentine and One-Fil PT using conventional bur and ultrasonic retrograde cavity preparation. One hundred prepared teeth were restored, dye-immersed, sectioned and evaluated under a stereomicroscope for leakage. MTA showed the least microleakage, followed by Biodentine, while One-Fil PT exhibited significantly higher leakage. Within study limitations, MTA remains the most effective retrograde filling material, with ultrasonic preparation offering additional sealing benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.