ArticleBioinformation2025
Immediate versus delayed loading of implants in posterior mandible: A CBCT-based one-year comparative study.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies emphasize that bone remodeling within the first year is a critical determinant of long-term implant success and marginal bone loss > 1.5 mm may jeopardize prognosis. Therefore, it is of interest to assess immediate versus delayed loading of implants in the posterior mandible over one year using CBCT evaluation. Hence, forty patients were treated with single implants allocated to immediate or delayed loading groups. Outcomes included implant survival, marginal bone changes and peri-implant soft-tissue health. Both groups achieved 100% survival. CBCT revealed slightly higher bone remodeling in immediate loading, though within clinically acceptable limits. Clinical parameters were comparable. Immediate loading, under strict case selection, may thus be a viable treatment option in posterior mandible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.