ArticleBioinformation2025
Osseodensification over standard drilling methods on implant stability and crestal bone level.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary implant stability basically depends on the quality and the quantity of bone. Osseodensification is a non-excavating additive drilling sequence used to enhance implant stability. Therefore, it is of interest to compare insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values after 6 months after surgery for standard drilling (SD) and osseodensification (OD) drilling methods. In this prospective study, total 40 implants with the same diameter and length were placed in 30 patients using SD (20 implants) and OD (20 implants) methods in the posterior maxilla. The amounts of IT after surgery, ISQ and crestal bone level at baseline and six months later were evaluated. The obtained data was statically evaluated. The OD technique provided a higher IT rate after surgery compared to the SD method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.