Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907915›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Frictional resistance of ceramic, self-ligating and metal brackets with various archwires.

Subham Pattanaik, Ashish Kumar, Abhita Malhotra, Roma Seshagiri, Mohammad Sohail Shaik, Siddarth Bhogi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Subham PattanaikDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial orthopedics, Kalinga Institute of Dental Science, KIIT Deemed To Be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Ashish KumarDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, NIMS Dental College, NIMS University Rajasthan Jaipur-303121 (Rajasthan), India.
Abhita MalhotraDepartment of Orthodontics, Manav Rachna Dental College, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Roma SeshagiriDepartment of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopaedics, Care dental college, Guntur andhra Pradesh, 522005, India.
Mohammad Sohail ShaikDepartment of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopaedics, Care dental college, Guntur andhra Pradesh, 522005, India.
Siddarth BhogiDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Sri Balaji Dental College & Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana- 500075, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bracket-archwire interface friction is one of the factors that influence the efficiency of orthodontic tooth movement and the total time of treatment. Therefore, it is of interest to compare ceramic, passive self-ligating and conventional metal bracketries in relation to their frictional characteristics for determing the types of archwires and their sizes with the bracketries. Frictional forces Frictional forces were measured under standardized conditions using 240 combinations of bracket-archwire through a universal testing machine. Brackets with the least friction were the self-ligating ones and the brackets with the highest friction were the ceramic ones, particularly with rectangular NiTi and beta-titanium wires. The self-ligating systems come with the benefit of high low-friction performance that improves treatment performance on the traditional and ceramic brackets.

Indexed as

archwire materialsceramic bracketsFrictional resistancekinetic frictionorthodontic biomechanicsself-ligating bracketsstatic friction

Identifiers

PMID41907915
PMCPMC13018358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.