Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907891›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Comparison of periodontal health in children with restored primary teeth using different restorative materials.

Aakash Vijay Patil, Nagaveni M Sangavi, Manasi Kulkarni, Anuradha Jagtap, Sunny Tandon, Adhithi Prakash, Tanvi Hirani

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aakash Vijay PatilDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, MGV'S KBH Dental College and Hospital, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Nagaveni M SangaviDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, ESIC Dental College and Hospital, Gulbarga, India.
Manasi KulkarniDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Al Badar dental college and hospital, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India.
Anuradha JagtapDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, MGV'S KBH Dental College and Hospital, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Sunny TandonDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kalka Dental College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Adhithi PrakashDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, Manav Rachna Dental College, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Tanvi HiraniDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of the restorative material used can have a significant impact on periodontal well-being in initial dentition though the comparative information is scarce. In this cross sectional study periodontal status of 240 children between 4-9 years of age fitted with restored primary molars with glass ionomer cement (GIC), composite resin, amalgam and stainless steel crowns (SSC) were compared and evaluated. Periodontal parameters such as gingivial index, plaque index, probing depth and gingivial recession were measured. It was proved that SSC caused much more inflammation and accumulation in gums than other materials (p<0.001) and GIC and composite resin did not differ in terms of periodontal outcome.

Indexed as

childrenprimary teethRestorative materials

Identifiers

PMID41907891
PMCPMC13018388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.