Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907873›Full record

ArticleEquity in education & society2024

Improving the equity landscape at U.S. academic institutions: 10 strategies to lead change.

Claudia Sp Fernandez, Monica M Taylor, Gaurav Dave, Kathleen Brandert, Suzanna Larkin, Katherine Mollenkopf, Giselle Corbie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Equity in education & society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claudia Sp FernandezGillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States.
Monica M TaylorCenter for Health Equity Research, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States.
Gaurav DaveCenter for Health Equity Research, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States.
Kathleen BrandertCollege of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States.
Suzanna LarkinGillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9070-5343
Katherine MollenkopfGillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States.
Giselle CorbieCenter for Health Equity Research, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States.

Funding

RADx-UP SAY YES COVID Test Study (S4)U24MD016258 · NIMHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN-WOLKOWIEZ, MICHAEL, DAVE, GAURAV J · 2020 to 2023
$116.7M
Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NIMHD NIH HHS U24 MD016258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, disparities with respect to race, ethnicity, and gender are common across academic institutions, particularly those that are large and have health research-oriented missions. Disparity-affected issues include leadership roles, funding, tenure, and salary. This paper presents a review of the current literature describing those disparities, with a focus on health professions serving major universities in the United States, and proposes approaches to create greater diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging (DEIB) within them. While many organizations nationally are working to address DEIB disparities, academic institutions can benefit from implementing structured approaches and training to nurture their cultures, foster DEIB, and promote psychological safety. We present a literature-based 10-component approach institutions can adopt with relative ease and thus positively support advancing their DEIB engagement. These 10 strategies include the following: Clearly stating DEI values; Conducting gap analyses to identify issues; Using incentives to propel change; Removing bias from recruiting processes; Implementing blind applications processes; Diversifying selection committees; Creating inter-institutional partnerships that truly represent shared power; Developing people and the pipeline; Formalizing mentorship and sponsorship programs; and instituting anti-bias training. Easily implementable strategies can both foster change and build the will and confidence to pursue larger DEIB goals in the future.

Indexed as

diversifying leadershipdiversity, equity, inclusion, and belongingdiversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging strategiesinstitutional culture

Identifiers

PMID41907873
PMCPMC13021095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.