Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907840›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Predictors of Perceived Educational Relevance: A Regression Analysis Based on Teaching CanMEDS Roles.

Verneri Hannula, Lari Lehtovirta, Petri Kulmala, Markku Sumanen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Verneri HannulaThe Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6305-1970
Lari LehtovirtaTampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9391-8915
Petri KulmalaUniversity of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2895-8563
Markku SumanenTampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9706-1456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The CanMEDS framework, originally developed for postgraduate training, has also been adopted in undergraduate medical education. Evaluating how well undergraduate training prepares graduates for clinical work is one way to assess its success. Materials and methods: This study examined how Finnish doctors perceive the correspondence between their undergraduate education and their current work, and how the teaching of CanMEDS roles and other factors are associated with these evaluations. Data came from the Finnish nationwide Physician 2023 survey (response rate 49%). Of the 4882 respondents, 1240 had graduated between 2014 and 2023 and comprised the study group. Respondents assessed satisfaction with hospital and health centre training and with the teaching of the seven CanMEDS roles. Binary logistic regression was used to examine associations with perceived correspondence between undergraduate education and current work. Results: About 45% of respondents reported that their education corresponded well to their work. Nearly 80% were satisfied with hospital training, while only slightly more than half were satisfied with health centre training. The regression model explained 30% (Nagelkerke Conclusions: Finnish doctors' perceptions of undergraduate education aligning with work were strongly linked to the teaching of medical knowledge and lifelong learning. Hospital training contributed more to perceived preparedness than health centre training. Several CanMEDS roles showed limited association with preparedness.

Indexed as

CanMEDScompetencypreparednesssurveyundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID41907840
PMCPMC13018681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.