ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Feasibility of a Multi-Perspective Diagnostic Teaching Feedback Tool in Undergraduate Physiotherapy Education.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This feasibility study explored the implementation of the diagnostic teaching feedback tool over a ten-day period in an undergraduate physiotherapy course at the Bern University of Applied Sciences. The main goal was to evaluate how feasible it is to incorporate the tool and its ability to facilitate short-term instructional development aligned with learner-oriented instruction (LOI). Method: One course instructor, one external observer, and a cohort of physiotherapy students participated. Data were collected twice using questionnaires completed by students, the lecturer (self-evaluation), and the observer, enabling multi-perspective comparison. Results: Feasibility was partially achieved: the tool was administered and analyzed within the planned timeframe, but student acceptance was below targets (attrition 17%, adherence 83%). Regression analyses revealed only small to moderate associations between teaching dimensions and Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation performance, and no clear evidence of LOI enhancement. Conclusion: Discrepancies between perspectives and low engagement highlight the need for motivational strategies, structured reflection, and observer training. Future research should utilize larger samples, randomized designs, and supplementary assessments to evaluate effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.