ArticleKidney international reports2026
Assessing the Implementation of Electronic Kidney Transplant Referral and Communication Programs.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Messages in Bottles: Why Pretransplant Care Coordination Remains so Difficult.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Efficient communication between dialysis and kidney transplant centers is crucial to move patients through the transplant process. The implementation outcomes of electronic transplant referral and communication programs to improve this communication are unknown. Methods: Using a convergent mixed-methods design, a process evaluation was conducted in 2023 to assess the dialysis and transplant center staff implementation of electronic transplant referral and communication programs according to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework via surveys and interviews. Results: Overall, 101 dialysis and 30 transplant center staff completed the survey, and 84% reported using electronic transplant referral and communication programs. Respondents were 96% female, 67% social workers, and 38% had > 10 years of field experience. Respondents indicated that electronic referral programs were easy to use (70%) and effective for sending or receiving transplant referrals (80%); however, unreliable use by other staff was a barrier to using these programs (36%). Interviews ( Conclusion: Electronic transplant referral and communication programs may streamline kidney transplant referrals and enhance communication; however, implementation varies between dialysis and transplant center staff. Understanding the implementation of these programs can inform interventions to refine and scale-up their use, to ultimately improve access to kidney transplant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.