ArticleKidney international reports2026
Systematic Review of Immunosuppression After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in targeted and cellular therapies for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: immunotherapeutic strategies and challenges.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in solid organ transplant recipients is a rapidly evolving frontier in immunotherapy and transplantation. In this context, clinicians must carefully balance the competing risks of allograft rejection, the potential for maintenance immunosuppression to diminish CAR T-cell efficacy and treatment response, alongside an increased infection risk. Given the heterogeneous nature of PTLD and the scarcity of clinical trial data in this specific population, there is currently no established consensus regarding the optimal maintenance immunosuppressive strategy post-CAR T-cell therapy. Methods: To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review of published data pertaining to CAR T-cell therapy and PTLD after solid organ transplantation. Results: Our findings reveal substantial variability in immunosuppressive management before and after CAR T-cell infusion, including the withholding of immunosuppression, or the use of single agent or combinations of corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), antimetabolites, or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. Given the limited data to date, balancing these competing risks is challenging, and no single immunosuppression regimen has emerged as clearly superior. Conclusion: Our review underscores the necessity of an individualized approach to these patients that accounts for factors such as CAR T-cell persistence and prolonged B-cell depletion, and highlights the need for further research on this clinical scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.