ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Clinical Analysis of Perforating Globe Injuries with Intraorbital Foreign Bodies: An 18-Year Retrospective Study.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated the clinical characteristics, management strategies, and visual outcomes of perforating ocular injuries associated with intraorbital foreign bodies (IOrFBs). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 54 patients with perforating ocular injuries and IOrFBs admitted to the Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2024. This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University (Approval No. 2024146). Data collected included demographics, injury circumstances, foreign body composition, size and location (measured on preoperative computed tomography [CT] images), surgical approaches, and visual outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using R, with significance set at Results: Of the 54 patients, 87.0% (47) were male, and 92.6% (50) sustained occupational injuries (both Conclusion: IOrFBs primarily affect working-age men and are typically caused by occupational metallic trauma. Larger foreign bodies predict worse baseline and final vision, whereas foreign body location and surgical approach do not independently influence visual prognosis. These findings highlight the need for early detection, occupational safety measures, and individualized management to optimize outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.