ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Ocular Symptoms in Long COVID: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Manifestations Associated with Pain in Nursing Students in Emerging Adulthood with Long COVID.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Ocular Symptoms in Long COVID: A Cross-Sectional Study [Response to Letter].Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Ocular Symptoms in Long COVID: A Cross-Sectional Study [Letter].Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study compared demographics, socioeconomic characteristics, pre-pandemic health conditions, newly diagnosed health conditions, and long COVID symptoms between participants with and without self-reported new-onset ocular symptoms after COVID-19 infection. Material and Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Listen to Immune, Symptom, and Treatment Experiences Now (LISTEN) study. Adults who self-reported long COVID, completed surveys between May 2022 and October 2023, and did not report post-vaccination syndrome were included. Ocular symptoms were defined as self-reported new-onset blurring or loss of vision, dry eyes, or floaters/flashes of light attributed to long COVID. Group comparisons used percentages for categorical variables and median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables as well as Bonferroni-adjusted P-values. A gradient-boosted tree model was used to identify symptoms that differentiated groups. Results: Among 595 participants (median age 46 years [IQR 38-56]; 73% female), 341 (57%) reported ocular symptoms. Pre-pandemic comorbidities were similar between groups. Participants with ocular symptoms had lower EuroQoL visual analogue scale health scores (median 40 [IQR 30-59] vs 51 [IQR 39-70], P < 0.001), greater financial difficulties (20% vs 8.8%, P < 0.001), increased worry about housing stability (16% vs 5.4%, P < 0.001), and higher rates of new-onset dysautonomia (38% vs 15%, P < 0.001) and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (21% vs 9.1%, P = 0.005). Key differentiating symptoms included dizziness, cold intolerance, pressure at the base of the head, tinnitus, and tremors. Conclusion: Individuals with long COVID with self-reported new-onset ocular symptoms after infection may represent a more severe phenotype, with poorer health status and greater socioeconomic challenges despite similar pre-pandemic health profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.