ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Frontocingulate-parietal-limbic circuits associated with both ruminative brooding and self-regulatory processes.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reduced task-switching flexibility in parietal-cingulate and frontal circuits associated with brooding.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ruminative brooding is a transdiagnostic symptom defined as repetitive dwelling on thoughts and emotions, and is linked to emotion dysregulation, maladaptive metacognitive beliefs, and abnormal interoception. The relative contributions of these factors and their neural mechanisms remain unclear. In this exploratory study, we mapped these processes onto directed cross-frequency coupling (CFC) networks using resting-state electroencephalography. Methods: We first identified symptoms of interest for CFC analyses by employing regularized symptom networks, revealing two clusters relevant to brooding: one dominated by interoceptive/mindfulness dimensions and another by metacognitive/emotional dysregulation, with brooding belonging to the latter. We then examined links between representative symptoms from each cluster and resting-state cross-frequency phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) using partial least squares correlation (PLS-C). Results: Emotional dysregulation and brooding dimensions co-varied with delta-beta PAC (representing a "brooding/dysregulation" neural signature), whereas mindfulness symptoms co-varied with beta-gamma and theta-gamma PAC (representing a "mindfulness/interoception" neural signature). More specifically, for the brooding/dysregulation signature, prefrontal and cingulate phase activity modulated amplitudes in regions implicated in emotion regulation and interoception. In contrast, the mindfulness/interoception signature reflected coupling within circuits supporting emotion regulation/interoception. Discussion: Overall, our results indicated that brooding was more tightly linked to maladaptive metacognitive beliefs and emotional dysregulation than to mindfulness/interoception, consistent with resistance toward one's thoughts and emotions. Neurally, as reflected through multivariate PLS-C covariance patterns, this may be linked to compensatory top-down control from prefrontal and cingulate areas over interoceptive, affective, and self-referential systems, pointing to the potential value of therapies that cultivate self-acceptance and modify maladaptive metacognitive beliefs for reducing rumination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.