ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026
Clinicians' Personal Delivery Preference and Decision-Making for Cesarean Delivery: A Survey of Obstetricians and Midwives.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The increasing prevalence of cesarean delivery (CD) worldwide has raised concerns in healthcare and academic circles. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing obstetricians' decisions regarding CD in Saudi Arabia. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving maternity clinicians (obstetricians and midwives). Data were collected using a structured questionnaire administered to a stratified sample of obstetricians practicing in healthcare facilities across the region. The questionnaire included questions about participants' demographics, preferences for the mode of delivery, and factors influencing decision-making. Data were analyzed using RStudio. Results: Infant and maternal safety, pain management, and long-term health implications were the main factors guiding CD decisions. Evidence-based medicine (EBM)-aligned practitioners were significantly less likely to perform non-medically indicated CS. Gender differences were observed, with female physicians more likely to prefer vaginal delivery. Partner influence and years of professional experience showed no significant effect on delivery preferences. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of EBM in guiding CD decisions and the need for open communication between healthcare providers and expectant parents. Future research with larger and more diverse samples could provide further insights into obstetricians' decision-making processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.