ReviewIndian journal of psychological medicine2026
Psychosocial Support for Siblings of Individuals with Autism: Insights from a Scoping Review.
Review in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychosocial adaptation of siblings of autistic individuals: current evidence, controversies, and future directions.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose of the Review: This scoping review was conducted to comprehensively examine global research on support groups for neurotypical siblings of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The study aimed to understand the psychosocial needs of neurotypical siblings, the available support, and the effectiveness of support groups in informing the development of an optimal support framework. Collection and Analysis of Data: We adhered to the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) to systematically map existing knowledge and identify gaps. The selection criteria included studies published in English from 2010 to 2024, including peer-reviewed articles, dissertations, and theses. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, MS Copilot, CINAHL, Ovid, and Web of Science, following a systematic framework, using defined keywords. Data extraction and peer reviews were conducted using spreadsheet-based methods to ensure methodological rigor. The spreadsheet included the study's metadata (title, author, year, and journal name), population demographics (gender, age, and sibling order), methodology, and limitations. Results: Of 662 screened studies, 12 met the inclusion criteria after review of titles, abstracts, and full texts. Most studies focused on the impact (n = 4), sibling relationship (n = 3), and varied intervention types. Support groups were found to be a feasible and acceptable intervention for neurotypical siblings, offering improved understanding of their sibling's condition, peer networks, safe self-expression spaces, better mental health, and coping skills. Conclusion: Findings support the development of tailored, evidence-based sibling support programs, recognizing these as a distinct domain in health and social care policy and funding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.