Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907785›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Transpedicular lower vertebral space osteotomy for thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to old osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

YuDong Xia, Li Li, Jie Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

YuDong XiaDepartment of Spine and Traumatology, People's Hospital of Changshou, Chongqing, China.
Li LiDepartment of Spine and Traumatology, People's Hospital of Changshou, Chongqing, China.
Jie QinDepartment of Spine and Traumatology, People's Hospital of Changshou, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite rapid developments in spinal osteotomy techniques, many inevitable short- and long-term complications still occur. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of transpedicular lower vertebral space osteotomy for the treatment of thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to long-standing osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and to explore more effective surgical methods to guide clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who were diagnosed with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to long-standing osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and who underwent corrective surgery at our hospital between January 2014 and December 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: the pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) group ( Results: During follow-up, it was found that there was no significant difference in the average degree of kyphosis correction between the PSO group and the transpedicular lower vertebral space osteotomy group. Compared with the corresponding preoperative values, the ODI and VAS scores in both groups showed significant improvement, while the complication rate was similar between the groups, and bony fusion was observed at the last follow-up. Conclusion: Transpedicular lower vertebral space osteotomy was associated with shorter operative time and lower blood loss than PSO, while achieving comparable radiographic correction and clinical outcomes at the last available follow-up. Complication rates were not significantly different between groups. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted.

Indexed as

osteoporosisosteoporotic vertebral compression fracturepedicle subtraction osteotomythoracolumbar kyphosistranspedicular lower vertebral space osteotomy

Identifiers

PMID41907785
PMCPMC13017897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.