ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Building an integrated multidisciplinary care system for emergency surgery in abdominal cancer: a patient-centered perspective.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal oncologic emergencies demand urgent surgical decisions that may conflict with ongoing cancer therapies and patient preferences. Conventional fragmented care models often lead to delays, inconsistent decisions, and poor care transitions. To address this gap, this perspective article proposes an integrated, patient-centered care model structured in three stages: rapid initial assessment, a structured emergency multidisciplinary team meeting, and coordinated care with seamless transitions. Central to this framework is a structured decision-making guide for emergency surgery that comprehensively integrates patient factors (health status, prognosis), tumor-related factors (emergency severity, technical feasibility), and patient preferences and context. Based on this triad, clinicians can pursue one of three clear pathways: immediate stabilization, definitive emergency oncologic surgery for suitable candidates, or prioritized non-operative or palliative-first approach when surgery offers limited benefit. Supported by innovations like standardized pathways and emergency-specific performance metrics, this framework aims to enhance safety, timely goal-concordant care, and resource efficiency in abdominal cancer emergency surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.