ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026
Latissimus dorsi flap: a comprehensive systematic review of traditional and novel applications.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Application of modified latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap in repair of Gustilo-Anderson typeZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- Reconstructive Goals in Arm and Elbow Defects Treated with the Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Flap.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is among the most adaptable and extensively employed techniques in reconstructive surgery, providing a dependable solution for addressing a wide range of defects. Although traditionally employed for soft-tissue coverage, its indications have progressively expanded to include complex and functional reconstructions. The aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive, indication-based overview of both traditional and emerging applications of the LD flap reported in the literature. Method: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, analysing published applications of the LD flap in reconstructive surgery. An initial search was performed up to July 30, 2024, and subsequently updated during manuscript revision to include studies published through January 10, 2026. Two independent reviewers examined the selected articles, individually extracting the relevant data, which was later combined and contrasted. Given the descriptive aim of the review, no statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 188 full-text articles were included. Based on anatomical location, indications were categorized into breast, head and neck, thorax and back, abdomen and pelvis, and upper and lower extremity reconstruction. Both coverage and functional applications were identified. Functional reconstructions included innervated and non-innervated LD flaps used for facial reanimation, limb motor restoration, urologic reconstruction (including phalloplasty and detrusor myoplasty), diaphragmatic reconstruction, and other dynamic applications. Pedicled LD flaps were predominantly reported for anatomically adjacent defects, whereas free LD flaps were more commonly used for distant or complex reconstructions. Conclusions: The latissimus dorsi flap can be configured in multiple forms to address defects across nearly all anatomical regions. Contemporary literature demonstrates a clear evolution toward functional and indication-driven applications, supported by advances in microsurgical techniques and muscle reinnervation. This descriptive synthesis provides a structured overview of reported indications and may assist surgeons in selecting reconstructive strategies based on anatomical and functional objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.