ArticleRespirology case reports2026
Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for High-Risk Airway Interventions: A Safety-Net Hospital Case Series.
Article in Respirology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for High-Risk Airway Interventions: A Safety-Net Hospital Case Series.Respirology case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-risk airway interventions in patients with critical airway obstruction carry a substantial risk of respiratory failure, and conventional ventilation strategies may be inadequate to ensure procedural safety. Consequently, some patients are denied potentially life-saving or palliative interventions. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) has emerged as an adjunctive strategy to provide temporary respiratory support during complex airway procedures, though evidence remains limited. We present a case series of three patients with near-complete airway obstruction who underwent planned VV-ECMO-assisted therapeutic airway interventions at a safety-net hospital. Indications included severe benign tracheal stenosis and malignant central airway obstruction. In all cases, VV-ECMO enabled rigid bronchoscopy and multimodal airway intervention without intraprocedural respiratory decompensation or reliance on conventional ventilation. All patients experienced rapid symptomatic improvement, were successfully decannulated, and had favourable outcomes. These cases demonstrate that planned VV-ECMO can safely facilitate high-risk airway interventions and highlight its feasibility in a safety-net setting, with implications for expanding equitable access to advanced airway rescue strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.