Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907625›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

A machine learning-based predictive model for postoperative pulmonary complications in lung cancer and its SHAP interpretation.

Yun Sha, Zejing Huangfu, Xinyu Gu, Beining Tang, Zhenchao Lv, Yanming Li, Ji Yang, Jinyuan Yang, Shihao Shao, Zhonghui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yun Sha *Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming, China.
Zejing Huangfu *Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming, China.
Xinyu Gu *Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming, China.
Beining TangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming, China.
Zhenchao LvDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming, China.
Yanming LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming, China.
Ji YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Simao District People's Hospital of Pu'er City, Pu'er, China.
Jinyuan YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming, China.
Shihao ShaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming, China.
Zhonghui WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) significantly impair patient recovery and adversely affect the long-term prognosis following lung cancer surgery. Despite ongoing advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative care, the incidence of PPCs remains elevated, underscoring the pressing clinical necessity for dependable preoperative risk assessment tools. Methods: This study employed a retrospective design, encompassing 1, 223 patients who underwent lung cancer surgery, from whom perioperative clinical data were collected. Following data cleansing and feature selection, the dataset was stratified and randomly divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Model development and hyperparameter tuning were executed using stratified 10-fold cross-validation (CV) within the training set; all preprocessing and feature selection procedures were confined to the training folds to prevent information leakage. The discriminative and calibration performance of various machine learning algorithms were assessed, and clinical net benefits were appraised using decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were employed to elucidate the contributions of specific features to the risk of developing PPCs. Results: Among the evaluated models, the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm demonstrated superior performance, evidenced by a high area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and favorable clinical utility in the DCA. SHAP analysis revealed that factors such as perioperative inflammatory burden, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking history are pivotal in influencing the risk of PPCs. Conclusion: The developed machine learning-based predictive model, augmented with SHAP interpretations, effectively identifies patients at high risk for PPCs prior to surgery. This model provides a robust scientific foundation for tailored perioperative care and interventions, offering substantial potential for clinical application.

Indexed as

lung cancersurgerymachine learning modelspostoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs)risk predictionSHAP interpretation

Identifiers

PMID41907625
PMCPMC13022757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.