ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
A machine learning-based predictive model for postoperative pulmonary complications in lung cancer and its SHAP interpretation.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perioperative ΔNLR and ΔPNI independently predict postoperative pulmonary complications in non-small cell lung cancer: a difference analysis-based nomogram.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) significantly impair patient recovery and adversely affect the long-term prognosis following lung cancer surgery. Despite ongoing advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative care, the incidence of PPCs remains elevated, underscoring the pressing clinical necessity for dependable preoperative risk assessment tools. Methods: This study employed a retrospective design, encompassing 1, 223 patients who underwent lung cancer surgery, from whom perioperative clinical data were collected. Following data cleansing and feature selection, the dataset was stratified and randomly divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Model development and hyperparameter tuning were executed using stratified 10-fold cross-validation (CV) within the training set; all preprocessing and feature selection procedures were confined to the training folds to prevent information leakage. The discriminative and calibration performance of various machine learning algorithms were assessed, and clinical net benefits were appraised using decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were employed to elucidate the contributions of specific features to the risk of developing PPCs. Results: Among the evaluated models, the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm demonstrated superior performance, evidenced by a high area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and favorable clinical utility in the DCA. SHAP analysis revealed that factors such as perioperative inflammatory burden, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking history are pivotal in influencing the risk of PPCs. Conclusion: The developed machine learning-based predictive model, augmented with SHAP interpretations, effectively identifies patients at high risk for PPCs prior to surgery. This model provides a robust scientific foundation for tailored perioperative care and interventions, offering substantial potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.