ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Endoscopic submucosal excavation for a small rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor with serosal layer preservation: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract, with rectal involvement being relatively rare, accounting for approximately 5% of all GISTs. Due to the unique anatomy of the rectum, most rectal GISTs originate from the muscularis propria, which increases the risk of perforation during endoscopic resection. Although traditional surgical resection offers a high rate of complete removal, it is often associated with greater trauma and insufficient functional preservation. With advances in endoscopic techniques, endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) has been increasingly used in the management of small rectal GISTs; however, successful preservation of the rectal serosal layer during ESE remains rarely reported. Case Presentation: A 51-year-old woman was found to have a 0.5 cm submucosal lesion located 12 cm from the anal verge during a screening colonoscopy. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) revealed a heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion arising from the muscularis propria (4.7 × 4.0 mm). Contrast-enhanced MRI suggested a neuroendocrine tumor. After exclusion of contraindications, ESE was performed, achieving complete tumor removal with negative margins. Notably, the serosal layer of the rectal wall was fully preserved, preventing perforation. The mucosal defect was prophylactically closed with endoscopic clips. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and no complications occurred. Conclusion: ESE can achieve complete resection of small rectal GISTs while preserving the serosal layer and rectal function. Although this case demonstrates the feasibility and safety of serosal-sparing ESE, further studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.