ArticleThe European physical journal. C, Particles and fields2026
Model-independent searches of new physics in DARWIN with deep learning.
Article in The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a deep learning pipeline to perform a model-independent, likelihood-free search for anomalous (i.e., non-background) events in the proposed next-generation multi-ton scale liquid xenon-based direct detection experiment, DARWIN. We train an anomaly detector comprising a variational autoencoder (VAE) and a classifier on high-dimensional simulated detector response data and construct a 1D anomaly score to reject the background-only hypothesis in the presence of an excess of non-background-like events. We use simulated validation data to determine the power of the method to reject the background-only hypothesis in the presence of a WIMP dark matter signal, without any model-dependent assumption about the nature of the signal. We show that our neural networks learn relevant features of the events from low-level, high-dimensional detector outputs, avoiding lossy and computationally expensive compression into lower-dimensional observables. Our approach is complementary to the usual likelihood-based analysis, in that it reduces the reliance on many of the corrections and cuts that are traditionally part of the analysis chain, with the potential of achieving higher accuracy and significant reduction of analysis time. We envisage the methodology presented in this work augmenting or complementing likelihood-based and other data-driven methods currently utilized in the DARWIN (and in the future, XLZD) analysis pipeline.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.