Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907516›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2025

A tutorial on person ability scores for the IDD clinician.

Cristan Farmer, Natasha N Ludwig, Audrey Thurm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cristan FarmerNeurodevelopmental and Behavioral Phenotyping Service, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Natasha N LudwigCenter for Neuropsychological and Psychological Assessment, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Audrey ThurmNeurodevelopmental and Behavioral Phenotyping Service, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

Neurodevelopmental and Behavioral Phenotyping ZICMH002961 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI THURM, AUDREY · 2017 to 2025
$12.6M
Measuring Responsivity in Individuals with Profound Intellectual DisabilityK23HD115865 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Natasha Ludwig · 2024 to 2026
$511k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC MH002961NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD115865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For clinicians working in intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), serial assessment of developmental constructs is crucial for understanding conditions that unfold over time and for informing medical and therapeutic decision-making. Standardized tests offer a range of score options, but the norm-referenced scores used to identify disability have serious limitations when used to track individual progress of individuals with IDD over time. Many tests produce Rasch analysis- or item response theory-based person ability scores, which are intended for use in the monitoring context. Although some allied disciplines such as education have used these scores for decades, ability scores are not commonly used by most clinicians working in IDD. Recent work has fleshed out the advantages of ability scores in research, but little attention has been paid to the clinical context. Here we provide an overview of the provenance of ability scores and their use in the IDD clinical context, including suggestions for the integration of ability scores in clinical practice.

Indexed as

developmental testingitem response theoryperson ability scoreRasch analysisserial testing

Identifiers

PMID41907516
PMCPMC13028592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.