ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2025
A tutorial on person ability scores for the IDD clinician.
Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For clinicians working in intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), serial assessment of developmental constructs is crucial for understanding conditions that unfold over time and for informing medical and therapeutic decision-making. Standardized tests offer a range of score options, but the norm-referenced scores used to identify disability have serious limitations when used to track individual progress of individuals with IDD over time. Many tests produce Rasch analysis- or item response theory-based person ability scores, which are intended for use in the monitoring context. Although some allied disciplines such as education have used these scores for decades, ability scores are not commonly used by most clinicians working in IDD. Recent work has fleshed out the advantages of ability scores in research, but little attention has been paid to the clinical context. Here we provide an overview of the provenance of ability scores and their use in the IDD clinical context, including suggestions for the integration of ability scores in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.