ArticleACS central science2026
Integrating Functional Response and Target Binding for Mechanism-Centered Drug Screening by High-Mass MALDI-MS.
Article in ACS central science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early stage drug discovery is limited by the disjunction of function and binding assays, creating an information gap that leads to the high failure rate in hit advancement. This limitation is particularly pronounced for protein-protein interactions, whose large and shallow interfaces make it difficult to distinguish hits mechanistically. To address this, we developed a cross-linking matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) platform that integrates biochemical functional response and target binding in a single assay, thereby generating a multidimensional pharmacological profile. Using the SARS-CoV-2 RBD-ACE2 interaction and a set of 17 drug candidates for a proof-of-concept study, the platform revealed a clear difference between two inhibitors that appeared indistinguishable in conventional functional assays: one showed stronger affinity and preferential ACE2 binding, while the other showed weaker and less specific binding. These mechanistic differences were consistent with the results of a cellular antiviral assay, in which only the high-affinity inhibitor improved cell viability. This work presents a mechanism-centered, rapid screening strategy that provides early multiparameter insight, enables rational selection of high-quality leads for challenging drug targets, and is compatible with high-throughput formats.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.