Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907466›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Pipeline for FlowCam data processing with modular open-source software and optional machine learning classification.

Katerina Symiakaki, Tim J W Walles, Cassidy Park, Gülce Yalçın, Kananat Siangsano, Stella Angela Berger, Jens Christian Nejstgaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katerina SymiakakiLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Stechlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1726-7281
Tim J W WallesLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Stechlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3516-6150
Cassidy ParkLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Stechlin, Germany.
Gülce YalçınLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Stechlin, Germany.
Kananat SiangsanoApplied Mathematics, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0004-4535-0247
Stella Angela BergerLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Stechlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8835-545X
Jens Christian NejstgaardLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Stechlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1236-0647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging instruments are becoming widely used in plankton research as they offer several advantages over traditional microscopy: (1) processing orders of magnitude more samples and organisms per time, (2) collection of more quantitative trait data from all organisms, (3) reducing human bias including the possibility to reanalyse image data, (4) rapid imaging of samples avoiding bias by deterioration of preserved samples before analysis, and further (5) some imagers allow analysis of live organisms enabling detection and quantification of delicate organisms that cannot be properly fixed. However, processing the huge number of images produced by common plankton imagers such as the FlowCam (Yokogawa Fluid Imaging Technologies, Inc., ME, USA) remains challenging. VisualSpreadsheet (VSP)-the commercial software necessary to operate FlowCam instruments-offers images, associated particle properties, and statistical analysis tools. However, it has licensing costs, runs exclusively on Windows, and offers limited support for older software versions and machine learning classification. Third-party alternatives to VSP for image sorting and classification have shortcomings related to data format and applicability across systems. We developed a freely available, multi-platform modular pipeline for processing FlowCam data from various instruments and VSP versions, while also adding important functionalities. A preprocessing Python script unifies the output of different VSP versions and detects duplicate images. The size range of target particles can be determined by a user-defined threshold, and their individual biovolume is calculated based on a distance map algorithm. The preprocessed data is summarised in a CSV file that can be opened in LabelChecker, the open-source, cross-platform program presented here. LabelChecker displays FlowCam images without transforming the FlowCam's output format and enables annotation and validation of labels. The processing pipeline can be paired with machine learning approaches for automatic image classification. Classification results are stored in the same CSV file that opens with LabelChecker for easy label validation and further data processing. We demonstrate the workflow of this pipeline with two plankton datasets. We first annotate images and then use them to train a custom shallow, multi-input classification model. Focussing on accessibility, this pipeline (preprocessing, LabelChecker, and machine learning) paves the way for fast and reproducible plankton analysis of FlowCam data, and enables high-throughput analyses adaptable to a wide range of plankton studies. This freely available plankton imaging pipeline can facilitate a wider use of FlowCam instruments and their data, increasing the overall scientific output. Furthermore, its modular design allows for adaptation to data from other plankton imaging systems.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningPlanktonSoftwareClassification AlgorithmsArtificial intelligenceFlowCamImagingImaging flowcytometryMachine learning classificationOpen source softwarePlankton

Identifiers

PMID41907466
PMCPMC13024276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.