Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907426›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Workshop report-Vulnerability in multi-hazard risks: Addressing its complexity and dynamics.

Alexandre Pereira Santos, Silvia De Angeli, Franziska Stefanie Hanf, Mirbach Charlotta, van Maanen Nicole, Vitus Benson, de Ruiter Marleen Carolijn, Alexandre Dunant, Stefano Terzi, Pia-Johanna Schweizer and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readNews
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alexandre Pereira SantosDepartment of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Silvia De AngeliUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LIEC, Metz, France.
Franziska Stefanie HanfAtmospheric Science, Department of Earth System Sciences, Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Natural Sciences, Earth and Society Research Hub (ESRAH), University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Mirbach CharlottaDepartment of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
van Maanen NicoleInstitute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Vitus BensonDepartment Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.
de Ruiter Marleen CarolijnInstitute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alexandre DunantDepartment Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.
Stefano TerziDepartment Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.
Pia-Johanna SchweizerCenter for Climate Change and Transformation, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Taís Maria Nunes CarvalhoHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany.
Mariana Madruga de BritoHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany.
Kelley De PoltDepartment Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.
Robert Šakić TrogrlićAdvancing Systems Analysis Program, International Institute for Applied System Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
Marc van den HombergThe Netherlands Red Cros' Data and Digital Team 510, The Hague, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In November 2025, an interdisciplinary group of vulnerability researchers met in Munich and identified three challenge-opportunity clusters: first, overcoming epistemological divides to enable meaningful interdisciplinary integration. Second, the interoperability of data, methods, and evidence can strengthen robustness and policy relevance. Third, vulnerability assessments must adopt fit-for-purpose levels of complexity that preserve local context while enabling cross-scalar translation. This backstory is a call-to-action to accelerate the transition of the field toward robust, policy-salient, and socially legitimate integrative and interdisciplinary research.

Identifiers

PMID41907426
PMCPMC13018876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.