Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907392›Full record

ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026

Characterizing histological fatty accumulation, muscle atrophy, and fibrosis in relation to re-tear and revision after primary rotator cuff repair: a mean 3-year follow-up study.

Lindsey V Ruderman, Juliana Ibarra, Helen Rueckert, Abigail P Leinroth, Samuel Lorentz, Chad Cook, Christopher Klifto, Matthew J Hilton, Oke A Anakwenze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lindsey V RudermanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Juliana IbarraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Helen RueckertDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Abigail P LeinrothDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Samuel LorentzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Chad CookDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Christopher KliftoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Matthew J HiltonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Oke A AnakwenzeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The failure rate following primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is high. There is little existing literature reporting on failure rates in the context of the histological degree of fatty accumulation, fibrosis, and atrophy of the rotator cuff (RC) muscles. The objective of this study was to examine the association between histological fatty accumulation, fibrosis, and myofiber size of the RC muscles and re-tear and revision rates in patients who underwent primary arthroscopic RCR at a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Methods: This is a prospective study of patients who underwent primary arthroscopic RCR by a single surgeon at an academic tertiary institution between September 2020 and November 2023. All patients were indicated for RCR with a diagnosis of supraspinatus tear and had no prior RC surgery. Pre-operatively, RC tear size and RC muscle fatty degeneration using the Goutallier classification were graded on magnetic resonance imaging. Supraspinatus muscle biopsies were obtained at the time of surgery. Biopsy specimens were cross-sectioned and stained with LipidTOX and LAMININ to visualize lipid accumulation and quantify myofiber cross-sectional area at a histological level, respectively. FIBRONECTIN staining was performed to quantify histological fibrosis. Medical records were reviewed for RC re-tear, re-operation, or revision surgery. Patients were included if they had a minimum follow-up of at least 1 year, either by phone call or chart review of the latest visit with an orthopedic provider confirming survivorship. Results: A total of 53 patients (53 shoulders) underwent primary arthroscopic RCR and met inclusion criteria. Nineteen tears were partial thickness, and the remaining 34 full-thickness tears were roughly evenly distributed between small, medium, large, and massive sizes. Median Goutallier score was 1. Seven (13%) patients experienced retears confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging. Five patients (9%) had undergone revision (mean time to revision 21.8 months) while 48 patients were revision-free with a minimum follow-up of at least 1 year (mean follow-up 38.8 months). Reasons for revision included RC re-tear in 4 patients and glenohumeral arthritis in 1 patient. Revisions included revision RCR (3) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (2). There were no significant differences in demographics, tear size, repair type, Goutallier classification, LipidTOX/region of interest, average myofiber cross-sectional area, and % area FIBRONECTIN between patients with and without re-tear, and with and without revision. Conclusion: Histological fatty accumulation, fibrosis, and myofiber sizes of the RC muscles were not associated with increased re-tear or revision rates following primary arthroscopic RCR at a mean 3-year follow-up.

Indexed as

Primary rotator cuff repairRotator cuffRotator cuff failureRotator cuff histologyRotator cuff muscle fatty accumulationRotator cuff myofiber size and fibrosisRotator cuff repairRotator cuff revision rate

Identifiers

PMID41907392
PMCPMC13022600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.