ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
Risk factors for progression of supraspinatus tear size and fatty infiltration in nonsurgically treated rotator cuff tears.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is no clear information on structural changes of rotator cuff tears during nonsurgical management. In particular, the risk factors for the progression of tear size and fatty infiltration still remain poorly understood. Identifying such factors is essential for optimizing treatment strategies and follow-up planning. Methods: We retrospectively examined 80 shoulders (43 men, 37 women; mean age, 68.4 years) with partial- and full-thickness rotator cuff tears treated nonsurgically. All patients underwent initial and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging examinations at ≥12 months, with a mean follow-up of 22.2 ± 12.6 months. Progression of supraspinatus (SSP) tear size was defined as a mediolateral increase of ≥10 mm or ≥5 mm/yr, and progression of SSP fatty infiltration was defined as an increase in the modified Goutallier classification. Univariate analyses were conducted to determine potential risk factors, including age, sex, initial tear size, subscapularis (SSC) tear, infraspinatus (ISP) tear, initial fatty infiltration of SSC, SSP, and ISP, critical shoulder angle (CSA), and the presence of persistent pain at follow-up. Factors with significant associations were entered into multivariate logistic regression for determining independent predictors. Results: On follow-up magnetic resonance imaging, both SSP tear size and fatty infiltration demonstrated significant progression. Univariate analyses revealed a significant association between tear size progression and initial tear size ( Conclusion: Progression of SSP tear size and fatty infiltration during nonsurgical treatment is closely associated with SSC fatty infiltration. Monitoring of SSC involvement may help identify patients at higher risk for progression of SSP tear size and fatty infiltration and support decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.