ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026
Institutional dynamics, stakeholder interactions, and sustainability pathways in North Toraja's Arabica coffee sector: a systems approach to inclusive agribusiness transformation.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: North Toraja's Arabica coffee sector-recognized for its distinctive quality and protected by Geographical Indication (GI) status-continues to face sustainability challenges shaped by institutional dynamics, power asymmetries, and socio-cultural contexts. Despite strong international demand, smallholder farmers contend with aging plantations, climate variability, weak bargaining power, and fragmented governance that constrain access to resources and influence over decision-making. Methods: This study adopts a systems thinking approach using interpretive structural modeling (ISM) to examine stakeholder interactions, map systemic constraints, and identify leverage points for inclusive transformation. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, expert questionnaires, and field observations involving farmers, cooperatives, traders, small and medium enterprises, and government agencies, and were supplemented with secondary sources. Results: The ISM results indicate that upstream institutional strategies-particularly minimum price guarantees and certified seed systems-exert the strongest driving power, shaping the feasibility of downstream initiatives across the value chain. Conversely, interventions such as youth engagement, post-harvest innovation, and digital marketing show high dependence on enabling governance, coordinated action, and sustained institutional support. Key barriers include intermediary dominance and the absence of sustained cross-actor collaboration. Discussion: These findings suggest that sustainable transformation requires linking top-down governance reforms with bottom-up empowerment to rebalance bargaining power and strengthen local agency. Multi-stakeholder platforms, inclusive decision-making processes, and context-sensitive institutional arrangements can improve coordination and unlock dependent initiatives. As a novel contribution, the study moves beyond descriptive stakeholder mapping by structurally ranking sustainability interventions and barriers according to their driving-dependence relationships, thereby identifying actionable institutional leverage points for GI-protected, smallholder coffee value chains. By integrating institutional, social, and economic perspectives, this study advances a sociologically grounded framework for agribusiness transformation, offering transferable insights for other smallholder-dominated commodity systems in the Global South.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.