ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Persistent Vision Loss of Eyes Lost to Follow-Up with Diabetic Macular Edema Receiving Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the visual and anatomic outcomes after being lost to follow-up (LTFU) among patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) that treated by intravitreal anti-VEGF therapies, and to determine the risk factors of persistent vision loss. Design: A retrospective cohort study using national registry data. Participants: A total of 5660 patients who were LTFU >6 months after anti-VEGF treatments from April 2020 through July 2024. Methods: Visual and anatomic outcomes at the visit before being LTFU, the return visit, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after return, and the final visit were collected. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of risk factors for persistent vision loss. Main Outcome Measures: Visual acuity (VA) and central foveal thickness (CFT). Results: After a mean LTFU period of 11.3 months, 2712 (47.9%) patients had vision decline at return visit. Identified risk factors included increasing age (45-64 years vs. ≤44 years: OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.07-1.56; Conclusions: Nearly half of the patients had vision decline after being LTFU, and after resuming therapies, vision loss still persisted in 2 of 3 patients. Clinical adherence should be strengthened for patients with baseline VA of 20/40 or better or having CFT of 350 μm or more at return. Multiple agents used were associated with vision recovery. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.