ArticleDigital health
A Kolmogorov-Arnold network-based approach to predict readmission in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The high rate of rehospitalization following catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients remains a significant clinical challenge. This study aimed to develop a novel prediction model based on Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) for postoperative rehospitalization and explore its clinical potential. Additionally, interpretability methods were employed to identify key risk factors. Methods: Real-world clinical data from 430 AF patients who underwent catheter ablation were collected. Core predictors were selected through feature engineering. A KANs-based prediction model was constructed and compared with seven traditional machine learning models, including Support Vector Machines and Random Forests. Model performance was systematically evaluated using metrics such as accuracy and recall. The SHapley Additive exPlanations framework was applied to interpret feature contributions and conduct individual case analyses. Results: The KANs model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an area under the curve of 0.85, representing a 12% improvement over the suboptimal model. Key predictors included Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Total Cholesterol. Individual case analyses revealed that the model effectively identified high-risk patients through biochemical indicator patterns, enhancing its interpretability. Conclusions: This study is the first to validate KANs in predicting postablation rehospitalization, enabling precise predictions and identifying critical biomarkers, thereby laying the foundation for improved postoperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.