ArticlePEC innovation2026
Usability, acceptability, and tolerability of a virtual reality patient tour compared to an educational video in cardiac surgery patients - A feasibility study.
Article in PEC innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Two patient educational methods for preoperative cardiac surgery are educational video and Virtual Patient Tour (VPT). We have developed the VPT, the next step is to assess the feasibility. Our aim is to assess the usability, acceptability, and tolerability of the VPT, in comparison with the current standard educational method, the educational video, from a cardiac surgery patients' perspective. Methods: A single-centre, cross-sectional feasibility was conducted from February to June 2023. The System Usability Scale (SUS), the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), and the Virtual Reality Sickness Questionnaire (VRSQ) were used to assess the usability, acceptability, and tolerability. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics. Results: Eighteen participants completed questionnaires. The educational video (78.9 ± 14.8) and the VPT (81.8 ± 15.3) both had high SUS scores, indicating high levels of usability. The UTAUT scores (educational video 59.9 ± 5.9; VPT 61.3 ± 5.7) indicated the acceptance of the educational methods. The low VRSQ score (12.5 ± 9.1) indicated that the VPT was tolerable. Conclusion: The educational video and the VPT were evaluated as usable, acceptable, and tolerable. Innovation: VPT is a Virtual Reality experience that enhances patients' comprehension of hospital departments by providing a virtual reality experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.