ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2026
Interpretable artificial intelligence for predicting blood transfusion after surgery for femoral shaft fractures: A retrospective analysis.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mirror, mirror on the wall, can artificial intelligence predict it all?Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Blood transfusions are often necessary in the surgical repair of orthopaedic fractures. However, these transfusions are associated with significant morbidity. The purpose of this study was to assess whether artificial intelligence (AI) based models can be utilised to predict blood transfusions after surgery for femoral shaft fractures and to identify the most important preoperative risk factors using interpretable AI methods. Methods: This retrospective study utilised 2015-2020 data of the femoral shaft fracture patient population drawn from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Five AI based models were developed using patient clinical information for predicting blood transfusions within 72 hours of surgery. SHapley Additive exPlanations were performed to visualise and interpret the risk factors that contributed to the model's performance. Results: A total of 1720 patients were included, of which 570 (33.1%) required a blood transfusion within 72 hours of femoral shaft fracture surgery. The Extreme Gradient Boosting model demonstrated the best predictive performance with an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve of 0.81 and a Brier score of 0.02. The most important risk factors for prediction were pre-operative haematocrit, age, platelet count, preoperative blood urea nitrogen, body mass index, preoperative white blood cell count, and preoperative creatinine. Conclusion: This study developed and internally validated an interpretable AI model for predicting blood transfusions in an isolated population of femoral shaft fracture patients with good performance. Interpretable AI based models may support anaesthesiologists and orthopaedic surgeons in perioperative risk stratification, management, and patient education but require external validation before clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.