Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907330›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2026

Interpretable artificial intelligence for predicting blood transfusion after surgery for femoral shaft fractures: A retrospective analysis.

Rameshbabu Manyam, Puneet Gupta, Pengfei Lou, Rui Guo, Andrew Carro, Eric R Heinz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rameshbabu ManyamDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0602-9632
Puneet GuptaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-6970
Pengfei LouDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9050-884X
Rui GuoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1873-7139
Andrew CarroDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1860-0840
Eric R HeinzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3194-8553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Blood transfusions are often necessary in the surgical repair of orthopaedic fractures. However, these transfusions are associated with significant morbidity. The purpose of this study was to assess whether artificial intelligence (AI) based models can be utilised to predict blood transfusions after surgery for femoral shaft fractures and to identify the most important preoperative risk factors using interpretable AI methods. Methods: This retrospective study utilised 2015-2020 data of the femoral shaft fracture patient population drawn from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Five AI based models were developed using patient clinical information for predicting blood transfusions within 72 hours of surgery. SHapley Additive exPlanations were performed to visualise and interpret the risk factors that contributed to the model's performance. Results: A total of 1720 patients were included, of which 570 (33.1%) required a blood transfusion within 72 hours of femoral shaft fracture surgery. The Extreme Gradient Boosting model demonstrated the best predictive performance with an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve of 0.81 and a Brier score of 0.02. The most important risk factors for prediction were pre-operative haematocrit, age, platelet count, preoperative blood urea nitrogen, body mass index, preoperative white blood cell count, and preoperative creatinine. Conclusion: This study developed and internally validated an interpretable AI model for predicting blood transfusions in an isolated population of femoral shaft fracture patients with good performance. Interpretable AI based models may support anaesthesiologists and orthopaedic surgeons in perioperative risk stratification, management, and patient education but require external validation before clinical translation.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceblood transfusionblood urea nitrogenbody mass indexcreatininefemoral shaft fracturegradient boostingmachine learningSHAPSHapley Additive exPlanationswhite blood cell countXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41907330
PMCPMC13020937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.