Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907327›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2026

Comparison of first-attempt endoscope insertion success between LMA

Japhia Selvin, Stalin Vinayagam, Yaal Elango, Suman Lata, Pazhanivel Mohan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Japhia SelvinDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4138-3316
Stalin VinayagamDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-2962
Yaal ElangoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8189-9227
Suman LataDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9965-1169
Pazhanivel MohanDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1473-4382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures under total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) pose risks of sedation-related complications. This study compared the first-attempt endoscope insertion success between the Laryngeal Mask Airway Methods: This prospective randomised controlled study involved 140 adult patients scheduled for upper GI endoscopy under TIVA. The participants were randomly assigned into two groups: Group L (LMA Results: The first-attempt success rate for endoscope insertion was comparable between the groups (Group L: 92.6% vs. Group C: 95.7%, Conclusion: The first-attempt endoscope insertion success rate was comparable between the LMA

Indexed as

Airway managementanaesthesiaendoscopylaryngeal masks

Identifiers

PMID41907327
PMCPMC13020930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.