Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907299›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Improving TCM question answering through tree-organized self-reflective retrieval with LLMs.

Chang Liu, Ying Chang, Jianmin Li, Yiqian Qu, Yu Li, Lingyong Cao, Shuyuan Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chang Liu *School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Ying Chang *School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Jianmin Li *Gancao Doctor Institute of Artificial Intelligence for Chinese Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Yiqian QuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Yu LiFaculty of Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, Macau SAR, China.
Lingyong CaoSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Shuyuan LinSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Large language models (LLMs) offer significant potential for intelligent question answering (Q&A) in healthcare, yet traditional knowledge representation methods fail to capture the complex, hierarchical nature of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) knowledge systems. The lack of effective retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks specifically tailored for TCM's unique epistemology limits applications. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel Tree-Organized Self-Reflective Retrieval (TOSRR) framework in enhancing LLM performance on TCM Q&A tasks through innovative knowledge organization and dynamic self-correction mechanisms. Methods: We developed a hierarchical knowledge representation system that structures TCM knowledge as subject-predicate-object-text (SPO-T) units within a tree-like architecture, enabling multi-dimensional relationships while preserving semantic context. Our iterative self-reflection mechanism implements dynamic knowledge retrieval and validation across textbook chapters and disciplines. Performance was evaluated using randomly selected questions from the TCM Medical Licensing Examination (MLE) and college Classics Course Exam (CCE), representing both standardized clinical knowledge and classical theory assessment. Results: When integrated with GPT-4, the TOSRR framework demonstrated a 19.85% improvement in absolute accuracy on the TCM MLE benchmark and increased recall accuracy from 27 to 38% on CCE datasets. Expert manual evaluation revealed substantial enhancements across critical dimensions: safety, consistency, explainability, compliance, and coherence, with a comprehensive improvement of 18.64 points. Retrieval-Augmented Generation Assessment (RAGAs) metrics confirmed the framework's superior knowledge utilization, retrieval precision, and resistance to information noise compared to standard RAG approaches. Conclusion: The TOSRR framework enhances LLM performance in TCM knowledge tasks through its hierarchical knowledge representation and self-reflective retrieval approach. And the framework has potential for application in teaching.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceknowledge graphlarge language modelmedical dialogue systemTraditional Chinese Medicine

Identifiers

PMID41907299
PMCPMC13019696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.