ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Association between neonatal birthweight and maternal vaginal wall prolapse: a retrospective analysis of postpartum women.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the association between neonatal birthweight (BW) and the maternal risk of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse in the postpartum period. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 864 postpartum women undergoing routine follow-ups after delivery. Participants were categorized into quartiles according to BW. Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to evaluate the association between BW and moderate-to-severe vaginal wall prolapse [Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q), POP-Q stage ≥ II], sequentially adjusting for maternal age, parity, mode of delivery, and plurality. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were used to examine potential non-linear relationships, accompanied by subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Results: In the fully adjusted model, each 1 kg increase in BW was associated with a 71% higher risk of posterior vaginal wall prolapse (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.18-2.53, Conclusion: Higher BW is an independent risk factor for maternal posterior vaginal wall prolapse, showing both dose-dependent and threshold effects. The results suggest that women who deliver larger babies may require enhanced postpartum pelvic floor evaluation and follow-up management, and further prospective studies are needed to explore the long-term implications of these findings on pelvic floor health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.