Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907262›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

AI-based planning for DIEAP flap procedures: exploring foundation models for artery perforators analysis.

Matilde Andrade, Nuno Loução, David Pinto, Tiago Marques, Ricardo Vigário, Pedro Gouveia, João Santinha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matilde AndradeDigital Surgery Lab, Breast Cancer Research Program, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Nuno LouçãoDigital Surgery Lab, Breast Cancer Research Program, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
David PintoDigital Surgery Lab, Breast Cancer Research Program, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Tiago MarquesDigital Surgery Lab, Breast Cancer Research Program, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ricardo VigárioDepartment of Physics, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pedro GouveiaDigital Surgery Lab, Breast Cancer Research Program, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
João SantinhaDigital Surgery Lab, Breast Cancer Research Program, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Breast reconstruction using the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator (DIEAP) flap is the gold standard for autologous procedures, but its success relies on challenging preoperative planning. Identifying perforator vessels from Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) images is currently a manual, labor-intensive, and variable process. This study's objective was to assess, fine-tune and validate an automated, end-to-end model-driven pipeline for the segmentation and quantitative analysis of perforator vessels to enhance planning efficiency and consistency. Methods: We developed a novel pipeline that first uses computer vision algorithms to extract anatomical priors and generate initial vessel centerlines from CTA data. These centerlines were then used as spatial prompts to guide a Deep Learning (DL) segmentation model. We benchmarked three state-of-the-art foundation models (SAM 2, MedSAM-2, and nnInteractive) in a zero-shot setting. The best-performing model, nnInteractive, was subsequently fine-tuned on our clinical dataset using a connectivity-aware compound loss incorporating Skeleton Recall Loss (SRL) to preserve vessel topology. Results: The fine-tuned nnInteractive model demonstrated significantly improved performance on a held-out test set of nine patients, increasing the mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) from a 0.174 zero-shot baseline to 0.265. Qualitatively, the fine-tuned model produced more anatomically plausible and continuous vessel segmentations compared to the baseline. Furthermore, the automated pipeline successfully quantified critical surgical planning metrics from the segmentations, including the perforators' intramuscular path length and their distance to the umbilicus. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of an end-to-end, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven workflow for perforator mapping in DIEAP flap planning. The use of foundation models guided by anatomical priors and enhanced with topology-aware fine-tuning establishes a robust method for reducing manual annotation burden and improving consistency. This automated pipeline is a promising tool to support more efficient and reliable preoperative planning, ultimately poised to improve surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

computer visiondeep learningDIEAP flapfoundation modelsmedical imagingpreoperative planningvessel segmentation

Identifiers

PMID41907262
PMCPMC13021440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.