ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development and validation of a prognostic model for acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically Ill patients with intra-abdominal sepsis: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for the occurrence and mortality of sepsis-associated lung injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To develop and externally validate a machine learning-based model for predicting the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with intra-abdominal sepsis. Methods: Data were obtained from the MIMIC-IV and the eICU-CRD database, including patients diagnosed with intra-abdominal sepsis. ARDS occurrence during intensive care unit (ICU) stay was defined as the primary outcome. Feature selection was performed using a combination of the Boruta algorithm, LASSO regression, and logistic regression. Ten base machine learning algorithms were trained and integrated into a stacked ensemble model. Model performance was systematically evaluated, and interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). External validation was conducted in an independent cohort of patients with intra-abdominal sepsis admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between 2016 and 2024. A web-based risk prediction calculator was subsequently developed to facilitate clinical decision support. Results: Among 1,120 patients included from the MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD databases, 554 (49.46%) developed ARDS during their ICU stay. Fourteen predictors were retained, including mechanical ventilation, use of vasoactive agents, history of chronic pulmonary disease, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, key vital signs, and routine laboratory indicators. The stacking model achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.811 in the development cohort, 0.794 in the internal validation cohort, and 0.756 in the external validation cohort. SHAP analysis identified mechanical ventilation as the most influential predictor, while early vasoactive agents use was associated with a reduced ARDS risk. Conclusion: A stacked ensemble model for predicting ARDS risk in patients with intra-abdominal sepsis demonstrated robust performance, stability, and interpretability. This model provides a practical tool for early risk stratification and informed clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.