ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Application of a nursing research order-service model based on a "demand-resource" linkage mechanism.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the application effects of a nursing research order service model based on the "demand-resource" linkage in clinical nursing research management, and to provide practical reference for improving the scientific research capacity of nursing staff. Methods: From May to June 2025, clinical nurses and nursing postgraduate students who participated in the service model were selected as the research subjects. A general information questionnaire, Nursing Research Capacity Self-Assessment Scale, Nursing Research Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and Organizational Climate for Innovation Scale were used to evaluate participants before and after the intervention. Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 software. Results: A total of 136 research demand orders from clinical nurses were received; after evaluation, 7 were declined and 129 were fulfilled. During the service process, 36 papers and 25 research projects were completed. Among the 126 nurses who submitted research orders, the total score of self-assessed research competence significantly improved after participation (mean difference = -0.611, 95% CI -0.931 to -0.291, Conclusion: The nursing research order service model, based on the "demand-resource" linkage, appears to enhance clinical nurses' research capacity and self-efficacy, while showing observed improvements in research abilities, self-efficacy, and perception of the organizational research climate among nursing postgraduate students. This model may be particularly relevant for clinical settings with limited nursing research resources and could help cultivate a supportive research environment, promote the development of nurses' research capabilities, and contribute to the advancement of the nursing discipline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.