ArticleSAGE open nursing
Polarization in Nursing-Interview Study with Nurse Leaders and Nurses.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Polarization, defined as the division of a group into two distinct and opposing sides, has become increasingly evident in nursing. This phenomenon may negatively affect staff well-being and create significant challenges for nursing management. Aim: To explore nurse leaders' and nurses' experiences and definitions of polarization in nursing practice. Design: A qualitative study using thematic interviews analyzed through inductive content analysis. Participants and Context: Data were collected in 2023 from nurse leaders ( Ethical Considerations: The study adhered to ethical research principles. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained from the relevant trade union prior to data collection. All participants provided informed consent. Findings: Both nurse leaders and nurses perceived nursing as polarized and deeply embedded in everyday practice. Polarization manifested through diverging individuality, siloed work units, organizational structures, and pressing societal challenges. Diverging individuality was linked to personal preparedness and demographic factors, while siloed work units reflected divisions within work communities. Organizational structures were shaped by sector-specific characteristics and employment relationships. Societal challenges included differing positions on multiculturalism, geographical disparities, and other contextual factors. Conclusions: Polarization in nursing emerges from individual, organizational, and societal dimensions. Nurse leaders primarily interpret polarization through organizational challenges, such as role conflicts and work community dynamics, whereas nurses experience it more at the individual level, for example, through reward systems. Addressing both perspectives is essential for identifying, mitigating, and preventing polarization. Understanding its multidimensional nature enables nurse leaders to implement strategies that foster inclusivity and collaboration, ultimately enhancing staff well-being, improving patient care, and strengthening organizational performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.