Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907131›Full record

ArticleArchives of plastic surgery2026

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Nasal Tip Anatomy for Rhinoplasty Planning.

Chuong Dinh Nguyen, Ngoc Ba Nguyen, Hue Minh Ho, Anh Ngoc Hoang, Tung Thanh Nguyen, Quynh Ngoc-Thuy Ho, Tho Thi-Kieu Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chuong Dinh NguyenDepartment of Postgraduate Training, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-1653-1792
Ngoc Ba NguyenDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Gia Dinh People's Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0009-0002-3638-5515
Hue Minh HoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Gia Dinh People's Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0009-0005-4292-1806
Anh Ngoc HoangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Thuan An City Medical Center, Binh Duong, Vietnam.ORCID 0009-0000-2754-9165
Tung Thanh NguyenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0009-0004-0090-8673
Quynh Ngoc-Thuy HoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0009-0004-2166-6466
Tho Thi-Kieu NguyenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gia Dinh People's Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-5104-9347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rhinoplasty outcomes are heavily influenced by nasal tip anatomy, particularly the thickness of the soft tissue envelope (STE) and the underlying cartilaginous framework. Traditional assessment methods are subjective, prompting exploration of objective techniques such as ultrasonography. This study evaluates nasal tip anatomy using high-resolution ultrasound imaging and correlates quantitative findings with surgical implications. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 35 adult patients at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients with prior nasal surgery, injections, fractures, congenital anomalies, or significant skin disease were excluded. A 12-MHz ultrasound probe was used to measure STE thickness at the nasion, rhinion, and nasal tip, septal cartilage thickness and dorsal length, and the internal nasal valve angle (INVA). Results: STE thickness was greatest at the nasion (4.11 ± 0.51 mm), followed by the nasal tip (3.95 ± 0.54 mm), and thinnest at the rhinion (2.49 ± 0.16 mm). The mean septal cartilage thickness was 2.09 ± 0.30 mm at the premaxilla and thinner at the dorsum (1.54 ± 0.26 mm). The mean dorsal septal length was 22.8 mm. Male patients consistently exhibited thicker STEs and septal cartilage than female patients ( Conclusion: Ultrasonography provides a reliable, objective assessment of nasal anatomy for surgical planning. Recognition of variations in soft tissue and septal morphology facilitates tailored approaches, improving both aesthetic and functional outcomes, especially in patients with thick nasal skin.

Indexed as

Asian rhinoplastyinternal nasal valve anglenasal tipseptal cartilagesoft tissue envelopeultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41907131
PMCPMC13030928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.