ArticleArchives of plastic surgery2026
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Nasal Tip Anatomy for Rhinoplasty Planning.
Article in Archives of plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rhinoplasty outcomes are heavily influenced by nasal tip anatomy, particularly the thickness of the soft tissue envelope (STE) and the underlying cartilaginous framework. Traditional assessment methods are subjective, prompting exploration of objective techniques such as ultrasonography. This study evaluates nasal tip anatomy using high-resolution ultrasound imaging and correlates quantitative findings with surgical implications. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 35 adult patients at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients with prior nasal surgery, injections, fractures, congenital anomalies, or significant skin disease were excluded. A 12-MHz ultrasound probe was used to measure STE thickness at the nasion, rhinion, and nasal tip, septal cartilage thickness and dorsal length, and the internal nasal valve angle (INVA). Results: STE thickness was greatest at the nasion (4.11 ± 0.51 mm), followed by the nasal tip (3.95 ± 0.54 mm), and thinnest at the rhinion (2.49 ± 0.16 mm). The mean septal cartilage thickness was 2.09 ± 0.30 mm at the premaxilla and thinner at the dorsum (1.54 ± 0.26 mm). The mean dorsal septal length was 22.8 mm. Male patients consistently exhibited thicker STEs and septal cartilage than female patients ( Conclusion: Ultrasonography provides a reliable, objective assessment of nasal anatomy for surgical planning. Recognition of variations in soft tissue and septal morphology facilitates tailored approaches, improving both aesthetic and functional outcomes, especially in patients with thick nasal skin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.